8 Reasons Why Grand Theft Auto: Chinatown Wars Is Better Than GTA IV (And One Reason Why It Isn’t)

1. No dodgy Serbian accents. While not the only thing that makes Chinatown Wars’s Huang Lee a more enjoyable protagonist than IV’s Niko Bellic, I’ll take no voiceacting over crappy voiceacting any day.

2. A sense of humor. Okay, so Grand Theft Auto IV wasn’t completely devoid of humorous moments, or attempts at humorous moments, but much of the main plot was dire, both in tone and quality. You met some colorful characters, but none were as wonderfully over-the-top as Zhou Ming, the arrogant psychopath from Chinatown Wars’s plot, who simultaneously courts the paparrazi while trying to meet secretly with the world’s most notorious criminals. This is no down-on-his-luck immigrant story, and it fits the mayhem and tone of GTA far better. In a world where you can bribe cops and go free just seconds after murdering hundreds of civilians and blowing up a building, the self-seriousness of GTA IV’s story just doesn’t fit.

3. Huang Lee. The protagonist of Chinatown Wars is a loveable wiseass, who makes characters that would otherwise be annoying a lot of fun. Spoiled buffoon son of a Triad boss who blames you for all his mistakes? I’d want to ring his neck if it weren’t for Huang Lee’s sarcastic barbs making us both feel like less of a chump. When Huang Lee speaks, he speaks for me. He sees the ridiculousness in the people around him and their demands, and he voices it, cleverly. GTA IV’s Niko Bellic has some of these moments and is certainly the more ambitious character, but a third of the way through the game I stopped believing that Niko Bellic was a guy with a bad past just trying to start a new life. When Huang Lee offers to kill someone for somebody, it’s because he’s a sociopathic wiseass. When Niko Bellic does it, it’s a betrayal of the plot and it renders his moping about trying to start over ingenuine. Huang Lee is just more fun.

4. Controls. Chinatown Wars’s car controls are tuned finely to the joypad. There’s no fuddling with a finicky cover system. Individual cars control differently, but making turns and zipping around the city is much easier. The cars don’t float like in GTA IV. They demand precise control, and evading a four-star or higher wanted rating is still a bitch, but they feel right.

5. Touch-screen minigames! Hardware advantage: DS. Surprisingly, hotwiring a car with the stylus never gets old, and is much more satisfying than tapping a button repeatedly. Touch-screen controls make it into missions in clever ways as well. Try evading cops while using the touch screen to keep a man’s heart going.

6. Drug-dealing. You got Pirates! in my Grand Theft Auto. Six different types of drugs with a dynamic market. You’ll get tip-offs letting you know that so-and-so is selling a certain drug low, or buying it high. Later you get access to a turf map that shows the supply and demand of each of Liberty City’s gangs. Got a dealer buying coke high but no coke on hand? Look up who’s selling it on your turf map. You might not get the best price, but if you’ve got a tip that someone’s buying, you’ll almost always turn a profit. Just watch out for random busts because if the cops catch you with that coke, they’ll confiscate it, and you’re out whatever money you just spent. Of course, you can always stash stuff in your apartment.

7. Random characters. A dying girl wants to go for a final joyride. A hotdog vendor wants you to plant a bug on his wife’s car. A porn star needs a ride to an audition. Some of them are peurile, almost all of them have a punchline, but all of them make the Liberty City of Chinatown Wars feel more alive.

8. Missions. Most of GTA IV’s missions boiled down to shoot and chase, or shoot and escape cops. Those are the meat and potatoes of the GTA series, so naturally they appear in Chinatown Wars, but usually with much more flourish. Chase down a tow truck and steal the car off the back of it so you can plant drugs in it and then get a two-star wanted rating so that the cops will impound the vehicle and arrest the owner for possession. Escape a bank robbery by marching in a Chinese New Year parade. Smash the engine of a street racing rival’s car. Plant a bomb in a vehicle and destroy a drug dealer’s den.

And now, one reason why GTA IV is better than GTA: Chinatown Wars:

1. Radio Vladivostok

Your Dragon Age is…

Pixels Past went has been on unintentional hiatus for the past month and change. It’s that holiday time, full of things to do that aren’t videogames. But there have also been videogames, just not of the old-fashioned variety.

I just got done with Dragon Age and it’s a strange game made stranger still when played on console (long story, not my choice.)

I think I can safely say that its combat, for good or ill, absolutely lives up to the “spiritual successor to Baldur’s Gate” moniker. Not that I got to experience much of that. Attempting to play the game the way it’s meant to be played on a console is quite clunky. The interface lends itself more to a hack-n-slash style experience even as the combat demands tactical precision. It’s an odd design decision that a full pause-and-select-attacks-for-all-party-members system was left out of the console versions in favor of cycling through party members in real time and then pausing to select an attack. In the heat of battle, I found the last thing I was capable of remembering was which trigger (left or right) to press to get to my teammates in the fewest number of clicks. Factor in the little delay as the console processes your request and that character you intended to heal could very well be dead by the time you get to your healer.

The inclusion of customizable AI tactics only alleviates this somewhat. There’s no way to nest tactics (that I could find), telling the game to check certain conditionals after checking others, and no way to include the party members’ full arsenal of attacks by the end of the game. Navigating lists and menus on a console isn’t exactly fun, and neither is re-tweaking your tactics before every boss battle in an attempt to compensate for the shoddy controls and sometimes baffling AI.

But there are other issues with the “spiritual successor” moniker. Dragon Age suffers from the affliction of a great many 3D RPGs in that it feels utterly claustrophobic. There are towns and there are dungeons and nothing in between. Unfortunately the nature of development these days seems to be that you either go the Bethesda route with your RPG and make a vast, explorable world at the expense of content, or you go the BioWare route and fill a very small world to the brim with meaningful content. I’d like to see more interesting quest chains and player choice in Elder Scrolls games, and I wouldn’t mind more locations in BioWare games that aren’t there just because they’re part of a quest. While even Baldur’s Gate didn’t allow you to explore the world freely, there were plenty of maps that were just wilderness to be explored, with maybe one or two quests or small easter eggs to provide pay-off.

There’s some very good stuff in Dragon Age, make no mistake. The main quest locations you visit are far more interconnected than in past BioWare games, and unlike the self-serious Mass Effect, there’s a fair bit of humor in the writing. Some dilemmas allowed for some truly surprising and creative solutions. Mages are over-powered, but they’re also the most fun part of the Dragon Age universe. There were places where my choices in role-playing felt a little limited (too much enforced shock at big moments), but on the whole, I was pleased with how far I was able to take my generally reasonable and compassionate human-hating city elf. The fantasy world itself is more than a little cliche (how disappointed my city elf was to find that the dalish weren’t the semi-feral pagan renegades he believed them to be and were, instead, the biggest pansies in all of Tolkein-inspired elfdom), but the attention to detail and history goes a long way to selling immersion in the setting.

One of the big selling points of Dragon Age is that it offers multiple origin stories–one for each race/background combination and one for mages–for Players to play through and make choices that impact the rest of their game. But perhaps the greatest selling point of Dragon Age is the end. Or ends. Just as it has many different beginnings, the game can end in so many different ways. Like the early Fallouts the finale of Dragon Age is careful to let you know how your actions have affected the world in the long run. It might be the only BioWare game to date that doesn’t boil down to a “good” ending and an “evil” one. That, more than anything, makes me curious to play it again. On PC this time.

Quickthinks, or What I Did On My Birthday Weekend

Been playing a little bit of a lot of games lately. Here’s the rundown, in brief:

Diablo II is smashy, smashy, killy, killy fun. My paladin, Ashenden, one-hits everything, except that cold-arrow firing boss in that one cave. It’s the kind of game that so far is ridiculously fun for twenty minute spurts. I suppose I’d get more sucked in, except the damned inventory is so very small and portalling back to town breaks up the action far more than I’d like. Then again, perhaps those trips back to town are good for my soul. Else I’m no better than the monsters, or something.

On the whole though, my other paladin, Ashenden, had a much more eventful weekend on his new server, running Karazhan for the first time. Yes, he’s level 74. Yes, his groupmates were 80s. Yes, he only gained ~4% of his next level. The thing about the raid encounters in World of Warcraft is that they’re the best, most elaborate scripted content in the game. Even stripped of the sense of achievement that comes from doing the content when it’s fresh, it’s worth seeing and experiencing. Also, some bosses are no respecters of level–I’m looking at you Netherspite (but not too hard, don’t take it the wrong way.)

When we weren’t beating on bosses (and running away from infernals), the lovely girlfriend and I spent some time with the fab four. We started late at night on guitar and bass, but after some beauty rest, it was time to break out the mic. Beatles: Rock Band is really a triumph of presentation. The between-set cinematics were great stylized slices of the Beatles’ history and added to the overall wonder that a single band could justify an entire game and such lavish presentation. Every element of the game says “Beatles.” You might not think of the Beatles as having a unique visual style, but they had several, and the visuals that accompany songs from the band’s various periods express that almost distractingly well. The only complaint we had was that it ended, minus a few beloved songs that we can only assume were held back for DLC purposes. But for anyone interested in a Beatles primer, I can’t think of a better way to first experience them.

Speaking of old things made new, the lovely girlfriend got me the Metroid Prime Trilogy for my birthday. I haven’t played much of it, but as an ardent lover of the Wii controls for Metroid Prime 3: Corruption, I can say that the Wii control scheme has arrived as good as ever to the original games. I thought the original Gamecube control scheme was rather ingenious when I first played the games–a clever way around the problem of aiming on a console, and of setting the games apart as first person adventures rather than pure shooters–but the Wii control scheme only serves to highlight its deficiencies. Make sure your sensor bar is at a comfortable height so you can rest your arm on your knee when you play, and once you’ve played these versions, you’ll never want to go back. I can’t wait to try Echoes, the only game of the three I never finished. I’m hoping that the breezier control scheme will ease the frustration of navigating the game’s oppressive dark world.

But my new, minor gaming addiction from the weekend is Little King’s Story. A kind-of RTS, the lovely girlfriend says it’s a bit like Pikmin, which I’ve never played, so I’ll just take her word for it. You run around as the titular king, collect townspeople of various jobs to do your bidding, collect treasure, commission buildings, gather lost art, and generally aim for WORLD DOMINATION. Except that your advisers are so hilariously inept, they keep underestimating the size of the world. I’d object to the fact that the first group you attack are little black monsters whose culture has a generic-tribal-African vibe, except I just got a cannon that shoots me around my kingdom for ease of travel and I, uh, still need a few million bol for that shopping center I want to build.

Re-format and November Game of the Month

As you may have noticed from the extensive period of silence, the blog is going to undergo a bit of a change. This is the holiday rush of games, and I’ve been playing new games as much as old lately. I’m still going to try to post a bit about a retro-game each month, but in order to cut down on the extended periods of silence, I’m going to start posting about what else I’m playing as well. Consider this my gaming journal. Some posts will be long and thought out, others will be quick thoughts as they strike me. Hopefully it will still be entertaining.

The November game of the month is Diablo II.

Yes, I’ve never played either of the Diablo games.* With the third game somwhere on the horizon and the newly released Torchlight getting loads of buzz for its take on the Diablo-style action RPG loot piñata, it’s about time I got around to it. Also, I found a copy of it cheap.

So far I have been unable to get it running on my Vista 64 machine, so I’ll be running it on my 32-bit XP box, but I’ll let you know if I find a fix for that problem.

* If you guessed that I didn’t play the original Diablo because it had a skull on the box, you are correct.

Love Is Jumping From a Plane Without A Parachute

Playing No One Lives Forever has gotten me thinking of Monolith’s more recent game: F.E.A.R. Up until now that was the only game of theirs I’d played. I enjoyed it a great deal, but I was baffled by the chief complaint everyone seemed to have about the game: the environments weren’t varied enough.

Now, at the time I hadn’t played Half-Life 2, but I’d played a fair number of other shooters. I could see how the office buildings and run-down apartments could feel drab compared to, say, Far Cry. But even Far Cry was severely lacking in the variety department. And apart from Xen, the original Half-Life all took place in one facility. I don’t recall a lot of different environments there. I guess you could argue that a mad science lab is more exciting than an office building, but I think that all comes down to context. It’s still nothing but grey corridors. But now that I’ve played more No One Lives Forever, I would like to think that those complaints about F.E.A.R. stem from people’s fond memories of Monolith’s previous work.

One of the greatest things about my experience with No One Lives Forever is the variety of environments. I can imagine the devs at Monolith brainstorming great locations and rejecting some amazing ones because they were not quite awesome enough. Or maybe they were just obsessed with modes of transportation.

So far I’ve been in a shootout in a Morrocan hotel, jumped from a crashing airplane with no parachute, snuck aboard a ship, escaped from the same ship while it was sinking, then scuba-dived into the wreckage of that ship, and captured an enemy agent aboard a passenger train. Yes, there’s been a fair number of warehouses, secret bases, and even office buildings in the mix, but where F.E.A.R. plays its locations safe, No One Lives Forever isn’t afraid to try anything, and it’s a better game for it.

Klaxon of Doom, or I Am A Terrible Spy

Apologies for the late first post. No One Lives Forever was not initially intended to be the October game, but my original choice turned out to be deathly dull, and I found the prospect of spending a month writing about it singularly unappealing. As a result, I got a late start on playing the two games of the month that I finally settled on.

My first impression of No One Lives Forever is mostly a good one. Much like Sacrifice, it has style. Unlike Sacrifice, it has a style we’ve definitely seen before, though not often in videogames. It inhabits the exciting, colorful world of 1960s spy movies. The world of James Bond. Of gadgets and nefarious-yet-colorful villains.

October 2009 Factsheet: No One Lives Forever 1 & 2

This month’s factsheet is a little late because I changed my mind about which game I’d be playing at the last minute (more on that later.) However, this month will be a two-for-one deal. I’ll be playing No One Lives Forever, which meets the criteria of the 12/12 challenge, and its sequel, which does not (it was released a year late.) I’ll be commenting on both individually and comparing the original to the sequel.

Released: 2000, 2003

Developer: Monolith

Developer Claim-to-Fame: No One Lives Forever, F.E.A.R.

Genre: First Person Shooter

Platform: PC

System Requirements: 1st game: Pentium II 300 MHz processor, 64 Mb RAM, 8Mb 3D Hardware Accelerator Card, 4x cd-rom, 400Mb Hard Drive Space.

2nd game: Pentium III 500 MHz processor, 128 Mb RAM (256 for Windows XP), 32 Mb video card, 1.2 GB hard drive space.

Where did I get it?: Neither game seems to be available new through standard channels. I purchased my copy of the first game used from Half-Price Books, and borrowed my copy of the second game from a friend.

It’s worth noting that the first game wouldn’t run under 64-bit Vista, and the 64-bit part seems to be more of the problem than the Vista part. I played it on my 32-bit XP machine and it ran fine, except for an issue with sound files not playing entirely (which I’ll discuss in more detail later.)

Final Thoughts: Sacrifice

The idea of calling this post “final thoughts” is somewhat absurd. As if there can ever be a final word on a game like Sacrifice. As if that final word could come from me.

After opening the DEMON GATE OF GOLGOTHA, I felt a little guilty. I helped Stratos oppose the forces of Pyro on my next mission, which earned me the ire of Pyro. I helped Persephone oppose Jadugarr, the unwitting prophet of the demon Marduke on the next, earning me the wrath of Charnel. I was well on the path to reform. I even accepted a mission from Persephone to close the demon gate I had worked so hard to open.

And then, I broke. It wasn’t the promise of riches, or power. It wasn’t a desire to be evil. It was restlessness, the persistent curiosity combined with indecision combined with boredom that leads me to pick one path and wish I’d picked the other.

I had closed the demon gate and was encroaching on Charnel’s territory, about to defeat his wizard, and he makes me an offer. I don’t hesitate. I’ve run too many missions for Persephone; I’m ready for greener pastures.

For my troubles, two missions later, Charnel gives me a little spell called “Death.” Death summons, well, death. And death kills all your enemies. And then if you’re too close, he kills you too.

And that’s really the final word on Sacrifice. It is a game of infinite surprises, with numerous ways to play, a truly unique world and aesthetic. It is an RTS that cuts through all of the ponderous economy-building of standard RTSes to plunge players right into adrenaline-pumping action. Play it.

Videogame Protagonists Should Be Jerks

The truth is, Eldred, the wizard at the center of Sacrifice, is a bit of a–well there’s no really polite way to put this, is there? He’s a bit of a d*ck.

It’s Raining Frogs

Sacrifice is a difficult game. It is also a challenging game. It is sometimes a baffling game. It has put me at odds with myself. Which is admittedly not that hard to do.